Healthcare organizations are spending billions on electronic health records, practice management software, lab systems, imaging platforms, billing tools, and payer portals. For many providers, all of this spending produces the same daily problem of having to enter the same information over and over because their systems don’t communicate well with each other and outside systems
The issue is not a lack of technology in healthcare, but that many systems were built separately, each with its own data formats, workflows, and business rules. Connecting these disconnected systems is expensive and has become one of the biggest challenges in healthcare operations, clinical care, and achieving equality.
More Digital Systems Doesn’t Always Mean Better Communication
In almost any healthcare organization, you will find several software platforms supporting patient care. One system manages appointments, another stores clinical records, another checks insurance eligibility, and another tracks lab results.
Each system may do its own job well. But together, they often create disconnected workflows, forcing staff to re-enter information, match up records, and check data across different applications.
Interoperability means healthcare systems can securely share and use information to improve patient care and reduce administrative work. But just adding more software does not guarantee interoperability.
The Challenge Goes Beyond Moving Data
Many organizations think interoperability is just sending data from one system to another. In fact, true interoperability needs three things:
- Systems must connect technically.
- They must exchange information using common standards.
- They must interpret that information the same way.
For example, one EHR might record diabetes with an ICD-10 code, another might use SNOMED terms, and a third might write it as free text. Even though they all describe the same condition, computers often see them as different unless standards bring them together.
It costs money to make these systems work together, and if providers do not have the funds, it does not happen. This is especially true for providers in underserved and low-income areas.
If several providers see the same patient but their systems cannot share information, it becomes very hard for the patient to get continuous care. This problem is even more common for providers who lack the money to fix these issues.
Legacy Systems Continue to Slow Progress
Many healthcare organizations still use software that was put in place years or even decades ago. Replacing these systems is costly, disruptive, and risky.
As time goes on, these integrations get more complicated:
- One interface breaks when software updates occur.
- Another requires manual monitoring.
- A third only transfers partial patient information.
Instead, organizations often build custom connections to link old systems with new ones. These links are fragile and require a lot of resources to maintain, taking time and money away from improving patient care and healthcare equality.
Standards Like FHIR Are Helping, but They’re Not the Entire Answer
Healthcare has made great progress with standards like HL7 FHIR (Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources).
FHIR offers standard APIs that help applications share health information more reliably. CMS and the Office of the National Coordinator (ONC) keep promoting these standards through federal initiatives.
Patients can access their records through approved applications, while providers and payers can share information more easily using these standard APIs. Real interoperability needs all providers to use these standards the same way, and not just support them.
The Real Business Consequences of Poor Interoperability
Poor interoperability causes duplicate patient records, clinical decision-making delays, and rising administrative costs. Staff burnout, slower PA workflows, incomplete care coordination, and more documentation errors are also more likely in offices dealing with poor interoperability.
Disconnected systems cause more than just inconvenience. Better interoperability leads to improved patient outcomes and less unnecessary administrative work for providers, payers, and patients.
The Future Is Built on Connected Ecosystems
Healthcare leaders are moving away from one-to-one connections and toward standardized, API-based systems built on shared frameworks. CMS’s Interoperability Framework encourages networks, providers, payers, EHR vendors, and digital health companies to use common standards like FHIR and USCDI to securely and consistently move information across the healthcare sector.
As these standards improve, organizations can spend less time building custom connections and more time using health information to improve care quality, efficiency, patient experiences, and equality across all patient groups and locations. The challenge of interoperability is about connecting systems and information to create a better healthcare experience for everyone, no matter where they are in the system.
FHIR, APIs, and other federal initiatives are helping, but many organizations still use fragmented technology that needs expensive workarounds and manual fixes. Those who invest in standards-based interoperability now will have better care coordination, lower costs, improved patient experiences, and more healthcare equality, wherever they are in the system.
Do you want to help us make a difference? Every day, we work to improve health equality and invite you to help bring better care to more communities.
Take a look at our four ways to support us and pick the one that fits you best. We appreciate having you with us.
Follow “Health Equality in Action – Turning Access Into Outcomes” each week and join us as we learn together what healthcare equality can be.